Showing posts with label shure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shure. Show all posts

Shure PGX14/93 Lavalier Wireless System, L5 Review

Shure PGX14/93 Lavalier Wireless System, L5
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I got this at a local Guitar Center in Pasadena, CA. the label sign said $648 and they realized it was mispriced. In stores it's actually $399.99 and he gave me 10% off because I really wanted the lower model PG14 which they don't carry in stores.
At our church, we rent out a school auditorium where there's no sound padding. We currently have a Shure wireless handheld (looks like a Pg14 + handheld but I think it's some older model) and a Sennheiser wireless lapel system that's been giving us a lot of interference/feedback.
First I tried the new AKG wireless presenter set and it had a lot of pops and feedback even though we adjusted the squelch and other areas.
So we tried this PGX14/WL93 system and this past Sunday there was no feedback, pops, in interference. We only experienced the clean and clear interference-free sound that comes from Shure.
On the base unit, I mounted it on top of our other Shure (which was set to channel) 1 and pressed channel and it seems like channel 9 was the only available option (7, 8, 9 at first, but now just 9). I think this is fine as we won't be adding more wireless systems, as of yet.
Once we popped in the 2 AA batteries into the transmitter unit I brought the unit over to the wireless base and hit "auto-sync". I wasn't sure if it was 1 tap or hold so I held it and it synced. After that, everything worked beautifully.
I appreciated that the body transmitter was easy to use. Hold the top button for power (green), push once for mute (orange), and again for unmute (green). On the side there's a gain switch for mic (high), 0 (medium), -10db (low). the "0" level was the best because mic was too loud and pitchy.
The lavaliere mic was great. I originally thought it would pick up too many other ambient sounds since it's a condenser mic but even with the band playing in the back the speaker was the only voice captured in the mic. there were no pops from "p" sounds and it did not have ruffling sounds on the shirt/jacket (I did not put on the wind screen which is quite big and odd looking). All we received was clear sound.
The other good thing about this model (transmitter) is that you can use 3 different lavaliere mics: WL93 (which it came with), the higher end WL185, or the lower end PG185 which comes with the PG14/PG185.
WL93: $80, WL185: $100. PG185:$40.
Having loved the countryman, I am now completely fine with the above options. Countrymans break and cost $400+ just to replace the mic (yes just the mic!). I don't know how the lower end PG185 is, but I assume it's Shure clear. So for $40-$100 to replace a lavaliere mic, I would gladly choose this over and over again! And Shure will be the brand of choice over and over again.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Shure PGX14/93 Lavalier Wireless System, L5

Includes WL93 Omnidirectional Micro-Lavalier Condenser Microphone, PGX1 Bodypack Transmitter, and PGX4 Diversity Receiver.Reliable system for spoken word applications

Buy NowGet 24% OFF

Click here for more information about Shure PGX14/93 Lavalier Wireless System, L5

Read More...

Shure SE425-CL Dual High-Definition MicroDriver Earphone with Detachable Cable (Clear) Review

Shure SE425-CL Dual High-Definition MicroDriver Earphone with Detachable Cable (Clear)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Hi Everyone,
I just received my SE425's 2 days ago, and have had ample time to "break them in". After spending almost $300, I'm not sure if they're exactly as I expected. I previously had the Shure E2C, SE210, and SE310; all of them were wonderful in their own ways at their price points.
However, the SE425 have very similar sound to the now-discontinued and discounted SE310 even with two discrete drivers, while costing more (after SE310 price discounts). The cables are too rigid near the ears, making for uncomfortable wearing. Also, the nozzles/earpieces don't go as deep in the ear canal as previous models, but surprisingly without sacrificing sound isolation. The bass is too understated, even compared to Shure's "flat-sound" standards. The detachable cables are an amazing innovation (finally implemented), especially since my previous models have gone through 3-4 cable warranty repairs (crackling sound) while the drivers themselves were perfectly fine.
Beware, the earphone plug-in piece is quite large, making it very difficult to fit in iPhone/MP3 player cases (especially the iPhone 1st gen and iPhone 4 w/ bumper). The previous Shure models didn't have this problem, as their plug points were quite narrow.
Overall, the Shure SE425 seems more durable than previous models, but their high price point with only marginal improvements makes it slightly difficult to justify over previous Shure models, which are now heavily discounted.
I'm do not claim to be an audiophile who listens to music only through Amps and such, though I do value and understand quality audio. I mainly use these headphones with my iPhone 4 and laptop with higher bitrate songs (320 KPBS+ VBR).
Hopefully this helps, and good luck in your earphone search!!

Click Here to see more reviews about: Shure SE425-CL Dual High-Definition MicroDriver Earphone with Detachable Cable (Clear)

Designed for the demanding audio specifications of live performance, the SE425 is engineered to provide reference quality audio. Hear all the details of your music with Dual High-Definition MicroDrivers that deliver an incredibly accurate and balanced listening experience. Featuring Dual High-Definition MicroDrivers, the SE425 uses a dedicated tweeter and woofer for an accurate and balanced sound. Detachable cable with formable wire enables easy replacement and secure, comfortable fit. Sound Isolating sleeves in multiple sizes provide up to 37 dB of isolation.

Buy NowGet 19% OFF

Click here for more information about Shure SE425-CL Dual High-Definition MicroDriver Earphone with Detachable Cable (Clear)

Read More...

Shure PG42-USB Vocal Microphone Review

Shure PG42-USB Vocal Microphone
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I'll start by saying that I am biased and forgiving of Shure products. My previous experience with the PG58 was amazing, thus purchasing this model--which produces a more professional sound than simply using a mini-plug adapted microphone--was a no-brainer for me.
I began this journey seeking a USB microphone to use for my home recordings. I did not want to purchase an external board, nor did I want to regress to using the aforementioned mini-jack input. The best sound--least noise--that I could get, given my stipulations, was a microphone with a USB interface. In all honesty, I went looking for a Shure microphone with a USB interface. The models that appeared were the PG27USB (which I've recently heard as better for all around recording) and the PG42USB (which is "enhanced" for vocal recording). Since I have no need to record any instrument other than a human voice, the PG42USB was perfect. I happened to catch the microphone for a better deal here on Amazon, but even if I hadn't found the deal, I would've bought this at full-price.
Now, with all of that bias, you might think that I am going to exclaim that my experience was magnificent and that I am overwhelmingly impressed with the characteristics of the microphone...but that's not the case.
Stepping up to this level of microphone has been an interesting ride. When you go "Professional" you have to make sure that your environment complements the equipment.
I used this microphone in-hand for three months and was able to get great recordings. The interpretation of sound is wonderful, really. Voices sound crisp and controlled. Many times, I had to step back and wonder how such great sound came from sitting on my futon and holding the microphone...
...and then I bought a Musician's Gear Die-Cast Mic Stand, Black, a Nady MPF-6 6-Inch Clamp On Microphone Pop Filter, and Auralex Studiofoam Designer Kit, Charcoal Gray...
Looking back at my first recordings, it's amazing to me that I was able to even do that. At this point, with these additional accessories (necessities, really) there is little to distinguish the recordings I make and those made in professional studios.
The only other experience I have with USB microphones is with a M-Audio Producer USB microphone. Compared to the Shure, the M-Audio sounded muddy and not exactly clear. The reality that Shure only does microphones and headphones should stand as an affirmation of their specialties. A company like Audio-Technica, who makes standard, good equipment, can't hold a candle in this field. Well, yes, they can--just being dramatic, I guess.
You're reading this to get an idea on whether or not you should purchase this microphone.
Something I will complain about is the potentiometers on the microphone (Volume and Mic Gain). They, in a word, suck. In addition, the headphone amp on the microphone seems a bit noisy, but that noise doesn't seem to transfer to the recording, so I'll presume it's just the headphone amp. In addition, I have yet to successfully install drivers for Windows 7, thus I use XP to record. XP is great since my computer is built for Windows 7, so it screams with performance (I dual-boot with 7 and XP)... And that's always a good thing once you start getting real-time effects involved.
Is it worth $200?
That's a good question. I don't believe that this mic is worth $200+ however, the convenience features (low freq roll-off, realtime monitoring, mic pre-amp, built in pop filter--questionable, yes) do provide for a much easier time recording. If you do invest in this microphone, be sure to invest in the accessories mentioned above... As I said in another review, why put regular gas in a premium car? Pay the little extra, and your recordings will be the better for it.
I hope that helps!!
Update:
I have to retract my former statements about the potentiometers (gain, mix). Maybe they had to break in, but the problems I had with them earlier no longer exists.
Looking at what's available out there, and considering the Shure brand, this is a microphone worth getting. Sure, you could get a less expensive one, but the microphone is the first and last word on the quality of your recordings. Might as well invest in a great one...and this is, truly, a great one.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Shure PG42-USB Vocal Microphone

Specifically engineered for lead vocal reproduction, the PG42USB side-address condenser microphone easily plugs into a computer USB port for the convenience of digital recording. The PG42USB features a large cardioid diaphragm tailored with high sensitivity to clearly reproduce refined performances with guaranteed "Plug and Play" Shure quality.

Buy NowGet 27% OFF

Click here for more information about Shure PG42-USB Vocal Microphone

Read More...

Shure PG14/PG185 Wireless Lavalier System, H7 Review

Shure PG14/PG185 Wireless Lavalier System, H7
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
All we needed was clear transmission for spoken voice and this does the job admirably.
No static and more than adequate range for us (only needs 35 ft with one wall in between).

Click Here to see more reviews about: Shure PG14/PG185 Wireless Lavalier System, H7

Includes PG4 Diversity Receiver, PG1 Bodypack Transmitter and PG185 Condenser Lavalier Microphone for discreet spoken word presentation

Buy NowGet 23% OFF

Click here for more information about Shure PG14/PG185 Wireless Lavalier System, H7

Read More...